Time for another move; to Tumblr.

Please visit whatmarksaw.tumblr.com

Other than the new site being far more readable and easy on the eye, it's also been able to easily import all the posts from this blog (and the three previous incarnations from 2005-2007) in a nice searchable format. See you there!

TWO DAYS, ONE NIGHT
6/10
As someone who has experienced their role at work being made redundant, and who's had their lives impacted by depression suffered by others, this film about a post-treatment depressive being made redundant touched a bit of a nerve for me. In this film, a group of employees is offered a choice between having their agreed to performance bonus, or to keep the main character in a job, but nor both. Additionally the foreman is putting unfair pressure on the staff to pick the bonus. When the owner of the business is appealed to by the woman whose job is at risk, he agrees on a Friday afternoon to allow the team to have a new vote on Monday, so this film covers the attempts to sway those involved to let the heroine keep her job.

I didn't dislike this film, but I felt it was a little bit too linear, and at points repetitive to the point of (dare I say it?) redundant. I think with some more editing this film could have been a little more snappy in its telling. The subtitles also seemed to be confusing; I was unable to follow exactly how many colleagues she had to convince to let her win the vote, as the discussed numbers relating to it seemed seemed to keep changing throughout.

THE OVERNIGHTERS
6/10
Another documentary that would be best served waiting for a TV broadcast. This film is about a pastor in Texas, in a town whose mining interests are booming, and how he is providing food and shelter to those who are arriving in their town and down on their luck, hoping to find work and get back on their feet. It was well filmed, and the main character certainly was interesting enough to remain engaged. However, for such a divisive topic for the townspeople, it seemed that the filmmaker was making a pretty one sided representation of the subject matter. The abrupt direction change towards the end of the film appeared to be an attempt at salvaging a film that could have been interesting, but was apparently self-sabotaged by some of the pastor's actions external to the core subject at hand, and kind of seemed irrelevant. I guess I was hoping for a better overall story to be told.

PARTICLE FEVER
5/10
I seemed to enjoy this film about the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the discovery of the Higgs Boson Particle less than most people I spoke to about it afterwards. Really was a TV documentary blown up to a big screen presentation. Also went for longer than the 60 minutes it could have been with some better editing. I would have liked to have walked out having learned a little more. And I wish they'd have used a wider angle lens; it felt very hand held and hard to get a good feel for the scale at hand of the LHC. That said, the subjects themselves were well picked by the film makers. It was nice that they had several woman scientists partaking in the telling of the story, and the physicist factions between the theorists and he experimentalists provided some good entertainment. Overall, I'd suggest just waiting till you can stream it or watch it on TV.

LOVE IS STRANGE
7/10
A very nicely paced film starring John Lithgow and Anthony Molina, about two aging gay men in New York. They've been together for decades, but late in life decide to get married. Despite the laws being liberal, it unfortunately doesn't follow at the workplace, and this film tracks their relationship as a result. However, it's not even so much about that, but a film about family, relationships and love, with several story lines and snapshots showing us the life of a group of fairly everyday people. I liked that there wasn't a big collection of neatly tied points to end this film, and that bar a couple of particular circumstances this story really could have just about been about any old married couple and their family.

PREDESTINATION
7/10
This opening night film starring Ethan hawke and Sarah Snook is probably my favourite opening night at the festival that I've seen (having been to at least a few). It's a sci-fi film based on the short story 'All You Zombies' by Robert Heinlein, and was filmed in Melbourne.

I'm a bit of a sucker for a decent sci-fi flick, and the time travel-bending plot generally doesn't go astray. Effectively this is a story about a government agent with time traveling abilities who is tasked to divert history where deemed necessary to avoid major crimes from occurring. Admittedly, I guessed some of the plot points before they were revealed, but overall I thought it was well made and very well acted. Best to see it with as little knowledge as possible beforehand.

After quite some hiatus...

It's 2014, and this year I intend to attend MIFF in force (40 sessions booked so far). Stay tuned for reviews and updates in the coming weeks....

MIFF 2012

Long time no see. Been a busy couple of years! This year I only made it to five films at MIFF. I saw some last year too, but I guess I forgot to post them here.

BROKEN - ★★★★
A british drama/comedy around the families living in a small cul-de-sac. Tim Roth plays the father and did a fantastic job. Great performances by the young cast too. 4/5

MENTAL - ★★★★
New Australian comedy from the guy who brought us Muriel's Wedding, and with Toni Collette in the starring role. Made by Australians for Australians, I'm unsure how well this film would do overseas, especially with such broad accents. However, if you're the target market, this is a brilliant funny film with lots of laughs. Lost its way a little by the end I think, but not enough that I didn't enjoy it overall.

INTO THE ABYSS - ★★★☆
A documentary by Werner Herzog about capital punishment in the US. It follows one crime in Texas which resulted in a man being on death row. He does his usual brilliant job in creating an engaging film. Mainly interviews with the criminals, their families and associated staff who work in the death chamber. Seeing these people shows another version of reality.

THE INTOUCHABLES - ★★★★☆
Wonderful French comedy about a rich paraplegic who hires a down and out senegalese man to be his carer. Full of hilarious laughs and a bit of action too, this is a feel-good flick that will make you smile. Not as cheesy as Pretty Woman, but in some ways reminiscent of Conversation with My Gardener from MIFF 2007.

IN ANOTHER COUNTRY - ★★
South Korean film that does slight retellings of a similar story with the same cast playing different roles. Let's just say that if it wasn't a film I'd paid for on an individual ticket, and one of only five I got to see this year, and the last film of the festival, and about the only film that wasn't sold out in this time slot, I'd've walked out.

Nine films

Only got to nine films this year, and was so busy that I didn't do any reviews as I have done previously. So, here's a short and sweet rating (out of five stars) and summary:

FOUR LIONS - ★★☆
It was a politically incorrect premise, having a comedy about a bunch of would be terrorists trying to blow themselves (and others up) in the UK, but putting that aside, it just didn't really tickle me enough. Could have been a short film, or perhaps a series of progressive sketches on a comedy series. If you watch the trailer you've seen most of what there is already.

KIDS ARE ALRIGHT, THE - ★★★☆
Overall enjoyable film, though at times it felt a little bit like a 'zany US sitcom' because the mom was a mom and, wait for it, the dad was a mom too!, and it seemed to play that up a little too much at times.

LOURDE-No Rating
Fell asleep about five minutes in, and dozed through about an hour of it before I walked out, since I knew I wouldn't be able to pick up from there.

MONSTERS - ★★★☆
Pretty good sci-fi flick based around an idea where alien mutations/lifeforms exist in an 'infected zone' between the US and Mexico. A photojournalist must try and escort the daughter of his paper through this zone from Mexico to the US. Worthwhile if you enjoyed District 9 and Cloverfield, but not really as enjoyable for either. The biggest let down for me was probably the 'monster design'. While the effects were good,the look of them seemed a little uninspired.

THEY ALL LIE - ★
I don't know if it was just me but I didn't get what this was about. It felt as if they forgot to show us the first reel or something to set out the plot. I have really liked a lot of Argentinian films at previous MIFFs, so was looking forward to this one. I didn't walk out, but I may as well have.

TROTSKY, THE - ★★★☆
Pretty good Canadian comedy - would probably appeal to those who like the humour of Rushmore.

WEDDING PARTY, THE - ★★
I wish I could say I liked it more, but the best thing about it was spotting the shoot locations around Melbourne. The story just didn't sell me and the characters weren't believable. Some good performances by the actors, though. It felt like there was some confusion about who/what the story was really about - possibly was either undercooked or overcooked in the scripting.

WILD TARGET - ★★★
Comedy about an assassin who is hired to kill a young gal, but instead ends up not doing it, then protecting her from the would be killers. It was enjoyable enough, but I had a hard time buying into the level of 'bumbling fool' that the assassin's character was, given he was meant to be one of the world's best. Worth seeing.

SEX&DRUGS&ROCK&ROLL - ★★★
Another year, another film about a musical artist, this time Ian Dury & The Blockheads. It was very very well made, and the acting was top notch. I just can't work out why the story had to be told, because there didn't seem to be much of a differentiator here amongst all the other films featuring an artist who is self absorbed, takes drugs, mistreats their family, but are famous, so it must be okay since they wrote some hits. I don't mind the music, but am not a massive fan. It's an ok film either way, but probably far better if you're really into them. One day they'll start doing late 80's early 90s bands and I'll probably be a lot more interested. How about one about Primal Scream, or the Stone Roses, or Happy Mondays?

'Twas the night before MIFF

Yes, it's almost Christmas in July. MIFF 2010 is almost upon us. In previous years I've posted all the films I plan to see on a sidebar, but it's really not very future-proof, so I'll list my recommended films below. Note that I'm going to list all the films I'd intend to see if I were on a passport this year. I'll see a few of them and hope that I can find the rest at the video store on on SBS in coming months...

1981
ALAMAR
AU REVOIR TAIPEI
BEETLE QUEEN CONQUERS TOKYO
BOY
CATFISH
CELL 211
COLLAPSE
DISAPPEARANCE OF ALICE CREED, THE
FOUR LIONS
IN THE ATTIC: WHO HAS A BIRTHDAY TODAY?
KIDS ARE ALRIGHT, THE
LE DONK & SCOR-ZAY-ZEE
LIKE A DREAM
LOVE IN A PUFF
MAKING IT HANDMADE!
MATINEE
MONSTERS
SCOTT PILGRIM VS THE WORLD
SOMEWHAT GENTLE MAN, A
SPACE TOURISTS
STRANGE POWERS: STEPHIN MERRIT AND THE MAGNETIC FIELDS
TETRO
THE ALL LIE
TROTSKY, THE
WEDDING PARTY, THE
WILD TARGET
WIND JOURNEYS, THE
WORLD'S GREATEST DAD

If you see any of the above, feel free to add a comment on what you thought!

MIFF Preparation

I've written about this in previous years, but thought I'd revise my steps in preparing for MIFF each year.

So, how does one choose what films to see at MIFF? There are many different ways - some people I know turn up on the day and wander into whatever takes their fancy. Others pick a theatre and stick to that venue for a stretch to avoid the uphill sprint to a new venue between films.

I don't really do either. I plan, plan and then do more planning. It's not very wild or exciting, I know, but my time is limited, and I don't want to miss a gem due to lack of proper analysis. This especially is the case this year, as due to family commitments, this year I'll have much less than time to be sitting in the cinema.

So, here's what I do, in case you're looking for a system yourself.

1. Get a copy of the Melbourne International Film Festival program guide. These can be found all around the place at the moment - my local VideoEzy and cafe both have a pile of them. If nothing else, you can find one at any of the cinemas showing MIFF films, or at the MIFF box office at the Forum Theatre.

2. In the middle is a Film & Screening Index. I tear this out as it will be with me for the entire festival

3. In the Index, I hunt down all the lower-case titles and cross them off. They're short films, and I don't dislike them, but I'm not going to go and see a main feature based on what short film is showing before it.

4. Now comes the long and arduous task of ranking the films on offer. For each film, I look at the description to get a sense of whether I'd like it or not. If it looks potentially interesting I will also search the film on any combination of imdb.com, apple.com/trailers and rottentomatos.com. If I've seen something by the director that I enjoyed at a previous MIFF it's more likely to rank highly. There are also some things I keep an eye out for, which I went into more detail in a post from my 2005 MIFF blog, but in essense:
* ACMI only session means it may be a low quality film (very low budget, or shot on video)
* I am wary of words like 'experimental', 'dream-like', and 'visual code'. There are definitely people into these types of films, but I still like to have some kind of plot (even if not excessive).
* If it's a South Korean film, it may well be brilliant (some of my fave films in previous year are from there), but if it's some kind of futuristic police drama where the guide's entry is a confused outline of the plot points rather than a description of the film, it probably means it is not worth the time.
* If the film is a documentary, I recognise that many were (or should have been) filmed for TV rather than the big screen, and most of the best usually are shown on SBS within the 12 months following MIFF. Therefore, I tend to only watch the most interesting (sounding) documentaries, or those where the large screen add to the experience.

5. I rank each film from 1 to 4. '1' means 'must see, can't miss, no matter what'. There are usually around 4-10 of these each year for me. '2' means 'definitely want to see it'. '3' is 'won't see it unless someone persuades me that it's worthwhile'. And, '4' is a very special rating to signify a film that I won't see. I try to keep an open mind about films, so avoid a '4' where possible. But, I've seen enough (two) of Andrew Bujalski's films to know that I should avoid them, so he'll get a '4', and not liking horrors, I'll usually cross them off, unless it's a funny/dark humour one (like last year's Dead Snow). I mark the rating I give next to every film in the Film & Screening Index so that I can quickly tell what I suspected a film might be like when I'm trooping around the city and talking to others about their highlights.

6. Once I've ranked all the films, it's time to start planning the timetable. I fill in timeslots for the '1's first, and then the '2's. This is a fine art, as there are usually only two sessions for each film, and there are always some conflicts. Sometimes a film needs to be dropped. I'll give a preference to seeing films on weekdays at the 1pm or 3pm session where possible, since the cinemas are a little quieter then. In previous years I would choose the nicer cinemas over the worse ones, but now I'm less fussy. That said, I'll avoid too many Kino -> Forum -> Kino type runs. I used to often book a session prior to a popular/sold out one to get a good seat, as you can stay in the cinema between films. However, with the special queue for MIFF members, that's not so important now. If your time is worth anything at all, the MIFF membership is worth it just to avoid long queues and worse seats.

7. I try and be mindful to give a couple of breaks during the festival to avoid burning out in week two. And, I try to plan any social/family commitments before this step to avoid conflicts. Oh, and I consult with my wife and my friends who are going to see if any of us have chosen the same films, so we can try and see them together. A great way to track the films you and your friends plan to see is to use Daniel Shepard's awesome Film Festival Programmer - it lets you see what others are seeing, as well as offering an easy way to bulk add your films to the MIFF online ticket shopping cart.

8. Finally, when the grid looks like it's in place, I book all the tickets using MIFF's fantastic (and it really is!) online booking system.

9. Note that while I do plan all of the above, it's not always right. One year I forgot that I had a commitment on a Saturday afternoon/evening, which required lots of rescheduling. I also lose energy at some point during the festival and tend to start skipping days or late sessions. Or, I might get a burst of energy, or hear of a film that is meant to be brilliant, and then add a couple more. So, yeah, I'm not entirely inflexible. :-)

10. Forgot to mention, it's worth following the #MIFF hashtag on twitter to get a sense of what others are seeing and liking. Be careful of spoilers though.


Easy, huh?

Friday August 7 2009

LOUISE-MICHEL
3/10
The plot to this comedy sounded good - the story of a group of women who pool their redundancy payouts to hire a hitman to kill their ex-boss. However the style of comedy was one that for me just annoyed. I walked out after about 30 minutes, not seeing the humour in it at all.

THE HURT LOCKER
8/10
I was a little unsure about whether this film would be worthwhile. I've seen a couple of films about the Iraq war, and generally never been entirely enthralled with them. However, The Hurt Locker was an excellently made film which was a festival highlight. It's about a unit in Iraq that dedicates itself to investigating potential bombings, and where possible defusing them before they explode. It really sucks you in, and makes you feel like you're there, experiencing the pressure with the characters. Good stuff.

DEAD SNOW
8/10
I'm not really a fan of Zombie films, but I can say of the ones I've seen, this is probably my favourite. Mind you, I've not seen any Romero ones, nor the Evil Deads. I'm not much of a horror film goer. This is a gruesome comedy about a bunch of young Norwegians who go up to an isolated cabin in the mountains for a ski weekend. All the cliches are ticked here, including the old man who frightens them on their first evening and then goes on to tell them about the dark presence in the woods. Turns out that a bunch of Nazis never quite died, and are still pretty upset. Lots of blood splattering and spilling of intestines, but overall a good balance of laughs that leaves you happily entertained.


CHOCOLATE
Review to come

Thursday August 6 2009

FOOD, INC.
5/10
Sorry Food Inc, but you were the straw that broke this camel's back. During this film, I wanted to yell at the screen, which I suppose is a good thing in that it's inciting a strong reaction in a viewer, but for me, I was doing so in disappointment of an opportunity lost. I think there's a real story to be told here about the food industry, but I'm so tired of having documentaries that effectively come across as a liberal/left wing version of an 'A Current Affair' type story. It shouldn't be necessary to do this in order to get their point across, but in Food Inc they really try and ram it down your throat.

For example, in one part of the film, they show us the story of a hispanic family who apparently can't afford to buy decent food and are forced to eat $1 hamburgers at McDonalds. They show a scene of them wandering like they're lost around a supermarket with comments along the lines of 'Broccoli for $1.19? We can't afford that!'. Are you eff star star kay eye en gee kidding me? Add to this, the father has diabetes at least in part because he eats so much junk food, which then costs the family hundreds of dollars in medicine.

They also found a mother whose son died from ecoli poisoning. As a father, it horrifies me to think of losing my child so I have total sympathy for her and her loss, but it came across as just another desperate measure to convince us in a direction that didn't need such drama. A slight case of overbombing.

Oh yeah, and in the beginning of the film, we're told that four multi-national corporations dominate the US food industy, but this information is presented, as if we're meant to spit, based on those facts alone. Maybe we ought to be, but a) I don't think that being a multinational corporation immediately means you're an organisation with poor ethics, and b) splitting a large industry between four companies sounds a whole lot better than what's been going on with the computer software industry for years...

I'm not a right wing thinker, but this documentary is so biased in its presentation that even I wanted to reject it as overdone. That said, there are points that still stand true - corporations respond to demand. If consumers demand to know where their food comes from, and start making better choices, such as purchasing organic produce and meat from farms that respect the animals (at least prior to slaughter) then we can change things. I know that I'll be doing some research into milk now to see exactly what the difference is between the Puras and the Organic options, and also into the meat I buy when I do. (yeah, sorry, I'd love to be vegetarian, but bacon tastes too good).

BLACK DYNAMITE
9/10
And on the a lighter side of the film, we have Black Dynamite, a brain-resting comedy that is one of my highlights for the festival. Like 'The Lost Skeleton of Cadavra' from MIFF 2004, which was a glorious and hilarious tribute to b-grade 1950s sci-fi flicks, Black Dynamite nods towards the Blaxploitation films of the 1970s. I've not seen (m)any blaxploitation films, but you don't need to know the genre inside out to have a ball. It's about a real badass guy named Black Dynamite who is on a mission to find out who killed his brother and why. Set design is great, and the send-ups are done to perfection. I can't wait to see it again when my brain needs a rest. Champagne comedy! Or, should I say 'Anaconda, oooooooooh Comedy'?

IN THE LOOP
8/10
Based around the UK comedy 'The Thick Of It', (which apparently may be getting re-made into a US show soon), this political comedy was another highlight for me. Fast talking and quick-paced, it follows the story of a British minister who as a result of a botched radio interview, winds up becoming involved in talks between the US and the UK about invading Iraq. Peter Capaldi steals the show with his character, a foul mouthed Scot who doesn't take shit from anyone. A real role model for us all :). If you think you'd like the result of mixing The Office, The West Wing and Yes Minister into one show, don't miss it.

Tuesday August 4 2009

THE EXPLODING GIRL
7.5/10
When I booked this session, I wondered to myself whether the name of this film was a nod to The Cure's b-side 'The Exploding Boy'. I'm still not sure where the reference comes from, but this film was great in a low-key way. It's about a girl who returns home to New York City from college for her summer break. She catches up with a (male) friend who she's known for years, and the film goes on to show what they get up to. The story progresses as she has intermittent and somewhat awkward phone conversations with her boyfriend who is in his own hometown. A lot of it feels ad-libbed and the pacing is fairly languid, but there's enough story to make it enjoyable. Imagine Mutual Appreciation, Funny Ha Ha or Wendy & Lucy (all shown at previous years of MIFF), but done right. The lead actress looks a little like Zooey Deschanel and looked really familiar, but wasn't someone I'd seen before.

35 SHOTS OF RUM
6/10
A French film about a father who works on the railway. After his long days at work, he returns home to his adult daughter that shares his apartment. As the story unfolds, we find out more about the neighbours in their block and thus this 'slice of life' story goes. It was a nicely done film, but seemed a little unsure of what it was trying to say.

ART & COPY
5/10
A documentary about advertising which in itself was pretty much an advertisement for the advertising industry. In this film the subjects try to claim some credibility, suggesting that they're helping the population and can hit levels of near-art (if not art itself) in their work. It was very well put together, and quite interesting, but ultimately the reality for me is that for every 'good' advert or billboard there are thousands of shite ones. I'd agree that for example that the iPod billboards are visually great and near-art, but we're still stuck with erectile dysfunction ones. Worth a watch if it comes on TV.

Monday August 3 2009

TONIGHT OR NEVER
7/10
My 'n'th film of the festival that stars Anna Karina, and admittedly, my favourite so far. This was the first starring role that Anna had which wasn't directed by Godard. As always Anna Karina looked great :). It's set in an apartment over one evening where a small party is held amongst a few friends, and the conversations that take place. In parts happy, others sad, others angry. It floats by but has enough plot to keep you watching. The print wasn't very good quality, but I'm glad I caught it.

Sunday August 2 2009

LETTER TO A CHILD
7/10
A Slovenian documentary (of sorts) about the various phases of life. It starts with an interview with children at a primary school, and then continues through interviews with people from older and older phases of life; some teenagers, then a young family, then a family whose children were much older, and so on, ending with a man who I would suspect was around 100. Interspersed throughout, the filmmaker 'writes a letter' expressing his own thoughts on life. It was interesting, from a perspective of finding out how different age groups define what's important in their lives, and the lessons to be learned. Easily recommended if it comes on TV, but I wouldn't suggest it as a necessity in the cinema.

FLAME & CITRON
7/10
This film is based on a true story of two Danish friends who formed part of the resistance against the Nazi invasion of Denmark in World War II. They're given tasks by their superior to kill off key targets of the local Danish nazi sympathisers, but conflicts of interest on all sides mean that everything isn't as black and white as it might otherwise seem. Well made film, that is a little slow at points, but enjoyable nonetheless. Mads Mikkelsen (as seen in After the Wedding at MIFF previously, and also in Casino Royale) does another fantastic job in his role as Citron.

Saturday August 1 2009

LOVE EXPOSURE
5/10
I've always thought that Japanese culture is about as alien as you could find compared to that of the West, and this film couldn't come from anywhere else. It's a four hour marathon that amongst other plot points includes a Japanese boy who is trying to find a girl that is his 'virgin mary' by using martial arts moves to take upskirt photos of girls. Add priests, cults, cross dressing and the severing of at least one penis, and there you go. I walked at the 2.5 hour point having had my fill, believing that I'd seen as much as was needed. After consulting with a couple of others who made it through to the end, it appears that I was right :).

AMREEKA
7/10
A fish out of water story about a mother and teenage son who move to America from Palestine. It's a comedy/drama and never hits an extremely serious or overly dramatic note, but does provide some nice greys in the characters. For example, even the school principal makes mistaken generalisations about the mother, despite his best intentions.

AN EDUCATION
7/10
A highly polished film set in 1960s London. I wanted to see this mainly because the screenplay was done by Nick Hornby, and in my opinion, he's done some great books (High Fidelity, Fever Pitch) amongst some duds (How to Be Good). The story centres around a young girl in her last year of high school who has plans to go to Oxford. She begins to question these plans when meeting a playboy roughly twice her age who introduces her to a world of art and culture, which up to then, she'd only experience through books. I had a couple of problems with believability of some of the plot points, but overall enjoyed it. If you liked the Gilmore Girls, you may enjoy it, too. An intro and Q&A was done by the star actress, Carey Mulligan, and credit must go to her for one of the most articulate and to-the-point introductions I've seen at the festival.

Friday July 31 2009

IT MIGHT GET LOUD
5/10
Documentary from the producers of An Inconvenient Truth. It's about the love of guitars, told from the point of view of three generations of guitarists; Jimmy Page from Led Zeppelin, The Edge from U2 and Jack White from The White Stripes. Time is spent talking to each artist separately to discover a bit about their background, and also spent in a warehouse where the three artists meet to discuss guitars, music, etc. Unfortunately, the whole thing doesn't really work very well. You get the feeling that there's a degree of respect for each other amongst the three musicians, but at the same time, they each have their views on the world, and they're all different. I think it would have worked better as a four part tv series, where one episode was spent with each of the three guitarists and the fourth was made up of the artists meeting and discussing music with each other. I like all three bands to some degree - enough to have CDs by each, but not enough to be a major fan of any. If you're a big fan of any of the three, you might get more out of this than I did.

Thursday July 30

One of my marathon days at the festival!

PARDON MY FRENCH
4/10
Well acted story about an author with writers block and a school girl fan who is obsessed enough with her to try and assist her in any way possible. Unfortunately it didn't seem to have any direction, and the author spent the film wandering around in her self-centred world while being pandered to by those around her. Not worth the time.

I NEED THAT RECORD! THE DEATH (OR POSSIBLE SURVIVAL) OF THE INDEPENDENT RECORD STORE
6/10
I'm into technology and I'm into music. As someone who has spent waaay too much on records and CDs in the past 20 years, and watched with interest how the independent record stores struggle to survive. They're competing with the Internet (both for online ordering and online music distribution, both legal and illegal) and major record companies who clutch to extinct models for doing business as long as they can. This documentary gets full marks for trying and half marks for execution. While it was interesting to see the point of view from record shop owners who were closing down for one reason or another, I didn't really feel that all sides of the story were explored. We heard a lot of musicians and record shops bitching about the majors, but never did we get to hear the opinion of someone from a major. Furthermore, the cause of closure of one of the shops was a landlord who'd booted them. We never got to hear why they didn't just re-open somewhere else. Some arguments were flawed too I think - they were arguing how 'big box stores' like walmart only carry rubbish music, not a full range, but then go one to complain how the big box stores sell CDs at below cost. The idea of an independent record store being a community type experience is fair, but I don't think it just applies to music. Finally, the quality of this film was not cinema-grade. Hopefully they'll show it on TV soon, but I wouldn't recommend spending the money seeing it at a theatre. I've not been there yet, but as I departed the theatre staff from Sunshine and Grease, a record shop at 117 Little Bourke St were handing out flyers, so go check them out. And buy the music you love, in whatever media type and style you happen to choose.



AWAY WE GO
9/10
Ken Loach was a massive whiney sook and pulled his film from MIFF for political reasons, not before he agreed for it to be shown at MIFF. Nor was it before the guide was printed or tickets on sale. Nope, it wasn't even pulled before before both sessions of his film sold out. That's right, he waited until after all that before deciding to go all Sting on us. This is for you, Mr. Loach.

Anyway, the silver lining was that Away We Go was the replacement film for the session, and is my favourite of the festival (though MOON was still great!). This Sam Mendes film was the replacement for Ken Loach's film, and tells the story of a young couple who are expecting their first child. When they realise that they have no reason to stay where they're living, they decide to set out on a trek to find a better home to raise their unborn child. Along the way, they meet with various friends/family/ex-co-workers, and get a good dosage of the range of philosophies and beliefs parents choose to raise their children by. It's often hilarious and always entertaining. With a slightly different ending, I'd give it 10/10.

TREELESS MOUNTAIN
7/10
Cute Korean film about two young girls who are being raised by their mother. The father has been out of the picture for some time, and when the mother decides she needs to go and find him, she leaves the girls with family. She gives the girls a piggy bank and says that if they're good, they'll be given a coin each to put in the bank, and promises she'll return when the bank is full. The film takes on the perspective of life from the girls' point of view and offers many different slices of Korean life as the film unfolds.

Wednesday July 29 2009

STILL WALKING
7/10
A family drama from Japan that was very well written and enjoyable. It was a good representation of family and the dynamics that can occur when a family who doesn't spend a lot of time together gather for a meal. This can apparently be bought on DVD quite cheaply (around $15), and is worth considering.